Archive for Active No-Carber Forums A veggie-free zone
 



       Active No-Carber Forums Forum Index -> Research and Resources
Viking Dan

I guess I definitely have to give up coffee

http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/27/12/2990/T1

Although this study shows fasting glucose was pretty much the same with coffee, fasting insulin was almost 25% higher. Yikes!
Avalon

Give it up VD!  

As with anything meant to hook us by the money grubbing nasty busy buddies, give it up and in time you'll be free of the bean! Nasty nasty beans! You can do it! I did! Look at me hee hee! Dunno
jl53563

But on a VLC diet, fasting insulin should be very low.  So a 25% increase of a very low number could still be a very low number.   Sometimes using percentages can be misleading.

And as with many other things, the rules sometimes change for those on a VLC diet.  Our bodies just work differnently.  Don't be too quick to give up the bean!  Look what it's done for Ava.  Laugh
Viking Dan

jl53563 wrote:
But on a VLC diet, fasting insulin should be very low.  So a 25% increase of a very low number could still be a very low number.   Sometimes using percentages can be misleading.

And as with many other things, the rules sometimes change for those on a VLC diet.  Our bodies just work differnently.  Don't be too quick to give up the bean!  Look what it's done for Ava.  Laugh


I'd rather have some very low number than 1.25 times some very low number...but that's me.
ReddyMcMeaty

and I'd rather have coffee
jl53563

ReddyMcMeaty wrote:
and I'd rather have coffee

Me too!  With lots of heavy whipping cream added.  Toast
Avalon

Bawl
barb0324

http://www.upi.com/Health_News/20...rinking_women/UPI-51291213684618/

Grin
SandyDown

For just over a month now I have given up caffeine and diet sodas  Grin   very proud of myself,  not cuz am worried about the insulin its more to do with doing a proper detox, only I am having a decaf coffee (an excuse to put take in my cream really)  anyone knows if decaf coffee has same level of toxins etc?  I am trying to do a proper detox, so even stopped having decaf tea, I just have herbal (e.g. peppermint) and water.  But do love my Tall decaf  hot decaf  coffee with lots of cream in it.
Oh I read somewhere about dandilion coffe, its just a dark drink, doesn't taste like Coffe, but I suppose I can get used to it if decaff coffee is considered as toxin for the body?
SandyDown

did I sound a bit smug  Grin   Grin
jl53563

Don't be so quick to give up the Java!!!
Quote:
They found that regular coffee drinking -- up to six cups a day -- was not associated with increased deaths among the study's middle-aged participants. In fact, the coffee drinkers, particularly the women, experienced a small decline in death rates from heart disease.

The study found no association between coffee consumption and cancer deaths.

"Our study indicates that coffee consumption does not have a detrimental effect," Lopez-Garcia, whose research appears in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, said in a telephone interview. "It seems like long-term coffee consumption may have some beneficial effects."


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080616/hl_nm/coffee_health_refile_dc
jl53563

Sorry Barb......looks like we're citing the same study.
adwred

Not to be a broken record, but the peppermint tea would be more of a toxin than the coffee. It just has more powerful natural toxins in it. Peppermint is pure salicylate. I'd switch to chamomile, if you're interested in reducing the toxins. I've always been suspicious of decaf coffee because I've heard of them using formaldehyde in the decaffeinating process, but if you do well on it, then I wouldn't worry too much about it, especially if it's just one cup.
barb0324

Jeff, I don't think this one can be quoted enough!  Yup

(I'm on my third-quadruple-cup-of-Espresso with lotsa cream - YUM)  Grin
SandyDown

adwred wrote:
Not to be a broken record, but the peppermint tea would be more of a toxin than the coffee. It just has more powerful natural toxins in it. Peppermint is pure salicylate. I'd switch to chamomile, if you're interested in reducing the toxins. I've always been suspicious of decaf coffee because I've heard of them using formaldehyde in the decaffeinating process, but if you do well on it, then I wouldn't worry too much about it, especially if it's just one cup.


Thank you Red, I had the same feeling about decaf coffee, anyway I want to just do this total detox for a few weeks and see if it makes any difference... as I mentioned before I am readign this old book that says that body fat has several functions to play we all know the sexual attraction function and insulation function, and also  re using the fat cells to store toxins gathered through years of toxin intake, it also has several case studies to do with people who have been on long term medications and the body considered part of the medication as toxic but failed to filter it out through the liver... example of this is peopel who are on asthma, anti depressant meds, and even women who have had babies and used anasthesia...... it all depend on the person and their body's ability to get rid of toxins, but  the theory if the body can't get rid of some of the toxins  it just stores is in a safe place (the safest place away our fat cells)  that's why this fat is a sort of persistent fat and ot easy to take off... e.g. when eating processed food/wheat instead of depositing fats in the natural areas (natual areas are the areas of sexual attraction or insulation) we end up developing it on unusual places e.g. for a woman it would be the belly or waist instead of the hips or breasts.

The book also says if we try to get rid of this fat quickly via high intensity exercise, we'll get a toxic like symptoms (i.e. headaches, sickness, hangover like symptoms)  

All this can be mumbo jumbo completely untrue, I know however nothing is new here,  but I was thinking of this theory because I do feel as if I had something toxic every time I do exercise .. so want to do a total detox and see if anythin changes.

With regards to salicylate, I understand from my Dr (AKA DH) that its naturally occuring Aspirin, not toxins as you put it, however he did agree that some of his patients are allergic to aspirin, and he did say that this allergy is worse in the summer (Rhubab(sp?) and strawberries season !! )
However I am not allergic to aspirin, but as I am doing a detox will try to avoid the peppermint  for a while, can't see the harm... but I really really hate chamomile Sad    Sad   what about Aniseed or Sage tea?   for other fruit teas that are sold in tea bags... unfortunately its nto practical to bring the actual herbal leaves with me to work!!

(PS - sorry re typos and spelling,  got to do it quick cuz I need to get back to work  Grin

thanks again btw Happy
adwred

Yes a lot of doctors think aspirin is harmless or even beneficial. That's a very common attitude. Aspirin needs to be detoxed to be processed through the body, whether you're allergic or not. Some people are more sensitive to it than others, but aspirin is most definitely a toxin. It can just have short term anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, which is why people believe it to be good. But the human body has a limited tolerance for it. That's why it exists in plants - as a natural pesticide.
Carnation

Sandy, what is this book?
SandyDown

Its called 'Persistent Fat and How to Lose it'

Its an old book published in the eighties, DH got it from a second hand book sale - he got it for his own research but  thought I may be interested in it  Roll Eyes    Roll Eyes   but I think his intentions were good, he just knows how much reading I do about such subjects  Laugh

http://www.antiqbook.co.uk/boox/goddin/010570.shtml
SandyDown

Red, thanks, do you have a reference to any publications/research on the aspirin allergy thing? it would be good to show to my DH.
adwred

There's actually a whole thread dedicated to it in the Research and Resources forum, called 'Failsafe Resource Thread'.
SandyDown

thanks Red, but was hoping for a more scientific publications, can't see my DH getting convinced with stuff put on a web site called plants are  poison and rotton  Laugh
adwred

Have you even looked at the site? Not to mention, there are other resources listed there.
ReddyMcMeaty

you can lead a horse to water...   but they're usually illiterate.  or something of that nature
adwred

Nice to know that I put all that time into creating such a detailed thread (with references!) for nothing.
ReddyMcMeaty

Not for nothing!   Unless my saving my sons lives, my life, and our family is nothing.  And Carnation's debilitating pain was nothing.  And all of the people who dismiss me as insane, er I mean help by passing the information on to as well.....
SandyDown

i did look at it Red a while ago not recently, and thanks again gor compiling the information, I am and others are grateful am sure, only as I explained, the problem is not with you or the site, its DH, he is stubborn like that, and I know he wont look at any site like that...   as I said he's been treating patients with salicylate allergy for years, but he doesn't agree everyone is affected by them.. guess we need accept other's opinions sometimes without taking it personally.
Carnation

I don't need any stinking research (I guess I'm with bear and his black box theory on this one).  My own experience was enough to  erase any doubt I had that such a thing exists.  It was very hard to give up spices and my lemon lotion, but it has made all the difference in my life, no more cramps, no more stiffness in my hands.  Thanks again, red.
adwred

The site (which by the way its not called 'plants are poison and rotton (sic)', but 'Plant poisons and rotten stuff', which is in reference to the natural toxins in plants (plant poisons) and in aged foods (rotten stuff).

But if you bothered to actually look at the site (not to mention the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Allergy Unit site, which is affiliated with the leading university in allergy research and the 'Fed Up with Food Additives' site, which has thousands of both scientific and anecdotal references - which are both referenced in the thread, among many others), you'd see it's plenty scientific. And her blog, which is linked to her site references, literally, hundreds of scientific studies.
adwred

Thank you, C. and Reddy. And don't worry, I'll never give up nagging about Failsafe, no matter how hard it is to convince people. It's way too important. And C. I'm with you - I don't need any studies anymore, either, after experiencing what I have. It helped in the beginning, but now I'm so sold on it from experience, that I don't care if they came out with a study saying aspirin caused acute supermodel-itis.
Carnation

Crack Me Up First laugh all day, thank you.  Acute supermodel-itis!
copychick

i've gotten tremendous benefit from red's input and resources on plant chemicals.

but even if you don't look at any research, it is common knowledge that plants defend themselves via inherent poisons that are toxic to the things that try to eat them. just because a plant poison doesn't give you an obvious rash or cause prompt death like some do, it doesn't mean it is not having a more subtle but harmful effect.
SandyDown

Thanks again all, I am really glad you all have been able to find that your aspirin allergy is the culprit for many of your health issues, nice to hear you cured yourselves.

As for me for the time being am going to continue having my peppermint tea and strawberries with cream  -  what can I say, as Meg put it earlier,  if she’s GOT to have her coffee, I  WANT to have my strawberries and peppermint tea (as well as dairy  Laugh ).  Hope  you understand and accept our difference in opinion.

btw: I also found out that red meat flares my skin, any ideas?  it can't be aspirin? what could it be with red meat that causing my skin to flare?  and yes, mostly I was eating organic grass fed red meat.
adwred

Are you for real?
SandyDown

adwred wrote:
Are you for real?



Red: I don't understand why you are being so nasty to me?  I accept and acknowledged your opinions and health issues, and I take my hat off for you for being able to stick to what you believe is the best eating regime for yourself,  I have a health issue too, you know I have been experimenting for months now, and isolated  most food items to see what is causing me the issue, in all experiments I have done, it  seemed that  removing red meat does help my issues,  I hate this discovery as much as anyone else here, I sincerely believed  in red meat, but its not working for me, and need to stick to fish or may be some little chicken,  I am wondering if anyone else had  a problem, why do you have to be so nasty?  Do you believe other people's health issues are not as real or important or significant as your aspirin allergies?  Or may be we should dedicate the forum to your own allergies, and inability to do carnivore or whatever you feel like discussing as long as its about you and not anyone else? Would that make you happy?  

Anyway, I thought this was a support forum, but to me you are being very poisonous. One day you may grow up and think of others as well as yourself.  Good bye mate!! And do keep your hair on!
adwred

I say 'are you for real' because first you condescend about our 'aspirin allergy' and continually belittle us for believing that yes, vegetables and fruit might be harmful... say you're unwilling to ever give up strawberries and peppermint tea and then proceed go on to ask for our help about your skin flare ups?? You do realize that skin flare ups of pretty much every kind are caused by food chemicals? So is bitchiness, which makes you an ideal candidate for food chemical intolerance. Roll Eyes

OK, Sandy, I'm going to try to ignore how nasty YOU have been and help you here.

You cannot determine food sensitivities without doing an elimination diet. This is all laid out in the links I've provided, by the way. There is no possible way to say that 'red meat gives you skin flare ups' without doing a proper elimination diet, which you refuse to do.

So sorry, but until you're willing to open your mind, we can't help you here.

By mate.  Wave
ReddyMcMeaty

I'm just going to say that you can deny food chemicals all you want but you can't know until you try.   It's very easy to dismiss because you don't want to put the effort into it, I did it for long enough.  You can also pretend it's something else all you want to people who don't know a thing about food chemicals, but it's like someone living on potatoes, bread, noodles and burger king saying "It's these damned fries.   I know I'd be find if I just ate chicken sandwiches and stuck to low fat sauce for the noodles, but it's the deep fried food making me fat."     There is more to it than that.
Carnation

Sandy- it's unfortunate that you've taken this attitude toward red.  She, more than anyone here, has gone out of her way to help and support people in so many ways.  There are more than just a handful of us here who have benefitted from awareness of food chemical sensitivities, and it is not just our opinion that such things affect our bodies.
adwred

The sad thing is that no one benefits from these food chemicals, despite popular belief to the contrary. The fact that we are having reactions and others aren't means that we are just more sensitive to the harm that's being done because our bodies can't detoxify these compounds as easily, for genetic reasons. But the fact that these compounds have to be detoxified is a huge indication that limiting them is a good idea. It's not like salicylates are good for some and bad for others. Our bodies just happen to shout more loudly.
Paul

toxins in body fat

Hello,

I wanted to comment on an earlier post about toxins in fat tissue. A few years ago, I read one of Roy Walford's books - he was one of the major proponents of caloric restriction for longevity, and was the physician member of the Biosphere 2 project. Due to complications that I don't remember, the Biosphere inhabitants were unable to produce as much food as planned, so they lived for a long period on a semi-starvation diet.

Walford carefully monitored and tested himself and his colleges during their entire stay inside the Biosphere, and noted a sharp rise in levels of pesticides and other toxic substances in their blood as they lost weight. For most of our lives, our bodies have expediently stored difficult-to-process toxins in our fat cells, to safely store them, but as fat melts off, quite large doses of these substances can get dumped back into our blood quite quickly.

Walford was an advocate of losing weight very slowly - I believe he recommended about a pound per week - to avoid sudden surges of these stored toxins and to give the body time to deal with them.

I often think about this when I read of people losing tens or even hundreds of pounds very rapidly. I wonder if some of the complications, plateaus, etc. that people experience may be at least partly due to unexpected doses of some fairly nasty chemicals.

I couldn't find a good article about this, but here's one that at least addresses the issue:

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_3_166/ai_n6144024

- Paul
Carnation

Thanks, Paul.  I find it especially interesting since I'm in the 100+ (lost)club.
Avalon

Yes, something I never thought about. I must be pretty freak'n polluted!
Quote:
There was no difference in weight loss between the 11 participants who took the weight-loss drug fenfluramine and the 4 who received a placebo.

Always find something like interesting too  Yup

       Active No-Carber Forums Forum Index -> Research and Resources
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum